1903 Korea Issue Emblem "Falcon"
Korean Symbolism in Plain Sight?
Bud's Big BlueBud's Observations
Koreans like emblems. I do too. Their stamps flounce across
my album page like floats in a homecoming parade (see below). The only stamps
issued by a united Korea, they abound in badges and insignia swathed in frilly
borders. What’s not to like?
Well, apparently the Japanese didn’t like them. By the time
Japan administered (1904) then annexed Korea (1910) all the stamps shown below
were decommissioned, their usage banned, as a part of Japan’s effort to wipe
out Korean identity. (Even frilly stamps sometimes have bloody tales to tell.)
Only the Japanese language could be spoken in Korean schools and universities,
historic Korean documents were burned, dissent was crushed, even movies had to
be culturally Japanese. Korea as remembered was gone; now it’s totally Japan.
Only Japanese stamps are good anymore.
What about Korea’s stamps scared the Japanese? The symbolism
in the final series of Korean Empire stamps (1903) offers, I think, a clue (see
above pic). The bird, a falcon, looks suspiciously like a Russian eagle; Russia
was then Japan’s enemy. The bird’s breastplate is the Korean national symbol,
the Taegeuk (yin yang), surrounded by eight trigraphs that repeat the yin yang
in an endless cycle of universal balance. Eight more Taegeuks adorn the
falcon’s wings. And, because the number eight itself has special meaning for
Koreans, the falcon’s tail has eight feathers. That’s a lot of pro-Korean propaganda
to squelch.
There’s more. The falcon’s right claw wields a threatening
sword and its left grips a globe that insultingly shows Japan as a single
island waiting, one might suppose, to be whacked. This stamp series also
repeats the five-petaled mugunghwa flower, known in the western world as the
rose of Sharon. It’s an ancient and, during the Japanese occupation, a somewhat
secretive national symbol. Koreans planted mugunghwas to protest Japanese
control.
Uncancelled examples of the 1903 series, like mine, were
grouped and sold to collectors after decommissioning.
Census: 26 in BB spaces, two tip-ins, seven on the
supplement page.
A Korean postman and, maybe, propagandist
The first stamps of Korea was issued in November 1884 during the Joseon dynasty. But the Post Office was burned down (Gaspin Coup) in December 1884, so only the 5m rose and 10m blue of the issue were used, and then, not much.
So one will find the 5m and 10m unused in collections (CV $10+-$50+). Scott states there are counterfeits and reprints.
As one could guess, the three unissued stamps also entered the philatelic mainstream. They are listed in my 1947 Scott catalogue with a notation that they were never placed in use.
But the current catalogue has delisted them (Scott 3-5), but does have an illustration, as well as a value ($4-$8).
Frankly, they are such gorgeous classically designed stamps, I can see why they have remained popular, and can be found commonly in collections.
Big Blue has spaces for the 1884 10m blue (Scott 2), and the three now de-listed stamps (Scott 3-5). Check out the first line of Big Blue's Korea spaces.
Korea Blog Post & BB Checklist
Page 1
1a
1b
1c
Supplements
Page 1
Comments appreciated!
A nice page once again. It's getting harder and more expensive to complete Big Blue's Korea as time goes on.
ReplyDeleteScott notes the "reprints" of these, but I think that there are more than the 4000 printed for modern presentation booklets -- they turn up too frequently.
And other than those being watermarked(!), their paper is very bright white and very modern-looking. Easily detected if you know what to look for.
- hy-brasil
Really enjoyed the commentary on Korea and its history. Its stamps have become a particular interest for me, probably mostly motivated by my enjoyment over the past two to three years of a large number of Korean dramas of which I have become a definite fan (I think I have watched over 30 series completely through and a couple as many as four times, all with English subtitles thank goodness!).
ReplyDeleteThanks for the warning about the modern reprints. I've not yet checked for watermarks, but will. My #24 may be of the light-blue-on-white-paper variety.
ReplyDeleteI've not seen a Korean drama in recent years. Your comment about them prompts me to do so again. My closest friend from graduate school days is Korean. He and his wife always claimed that Koreans are the Italians of the Pacific -- i.e., very dramatic. Because of them, I'm addicted to Korean cuisine.