I particularly like Roland Klinger’s database (https://www.ro-klinger.de/NH/index.htm). He’s thorough and
avuncular in a chatty sort of way -- and he brooks no non-sense, of which there
is a sizeable amount when it comes to New Hebrides stamps. Check his web pages
often as you fill Big Blue’s spaces.
For example, there is much excitement about a 1903
fantasy stamp which shows a missionary being roasted on a spit. The originals,
of which three still exist, were printed on pink paper, according to Klinger. As
might be expected, forgers have gone berserk faking a fantasy. A green flimflam
currently being offered on eBay costs GBP39.99.
Make no mistake, a few early missionaries to the South
Pacific were cannibalized. But none were commemorated philatelically, including
the hapless Presbyter Cocidus named on the fantasy stamp. For images, if you
must, google "roasted missionary".
The keen interest in New Hebrides stamps is no doubt largely
attributable to the condominium arrangement wherein France and Great Britain
shared a single colony. The French and British each had their own stamps, and
also separate settlements, schools, churches, markets, and so forth. The stamps
were designed by the French and printed by the British -- same images,
different inscriptions in the banners (“New” and “Nouvelles”). The two colonizing
powers got along well enough with each other; with the indigenous peoples, not
so much.
As is the case in many South Pacific nations’ stamps,
used New Hebrides stamps ordinarily command higher prices than mint stamps. All
but two of mine are, alas, mint. One of the two (shown above upside down) is
common, cancelled in Port Vila in December, 1931. Klinger labels this variety
as PM6.
The second cancellation is more interesting. Since I
could not identify it using Klinger’s categories, I sent him a scan of it and
asked for his opinion. His response came the next day, and is quoted herewith:
Hello Bud,
The stamp you show here is postmarked with PM4 with two variations:
1. Color blue, which is scarce. I didn't mention it when I made the postmark pages [in the database] many years ago. But this happened in the New Hebrides. Even postmarks in red can be found. They took everything very lightly in the islands.
2. The day slug precedes the month. This happened, but very scarcely. As this postmark was used very rarely in the 1910s (most covers have PM2), I suppose that the date is (3)1 AU (192)3, the last digit being a "3" in my opinion.
So, this is a rather unique variant of the postmark on this stamp. Changing the colors shows the postmark a bit better:
Greetings from Germany. Roland Klinger
Well, Klinger’s response made my day. Even a
generalist sometimes finds a rarity or, as my grandmother often said, even a
blind pig sometimes finds an acorn.
Altering colors of a scan for clarification of the
postmark is a neat trick.
New Hebrides private local stamps can provide another
source of rarities. But the two issued by the Australasian New Hebrides Company
Ltd. (1897), shown below, are common. The scene represents ANHCo buildings in
Port Vila. New Hebrides local stamps generally attest to the difficulties
colonists had in getting their mail carried to nearby islands and to the
outside world.
Census: 47 in BB spaces, 32 on the supplement page.
Fun piece of trivia, many diplomats in Britain regarded the duplication of all government functions by both Britain and France in the New Hebrides as less than ideal, and wags came to call the situation the "Pandemonium of the New Hebrides" because of constand jurisdictional disputes.
ReplyDelete